Archive

April 2019

Parties cannot stipulate away the district court’s statutory responsibility to conduct a best-interest analysis.

utahmediations

Cox v. Hefley, 2019 UT App 60 (Filed April 18, 2019). In this case, a Mother and Father signed an […]

Stipulations may be upheld that are not unduly restrictive of judicial review or authority so as long as the order does not impede the court to retain jurisdiction or to make subsequent changes and orders as are reasonable and necessary.

utahmediations

Cox v. Hefley, 2019 UT App 60 (Filed April 18, 2019). In this case, a Mother and Father signed an […]

An attorney's failure to comply with the standards of professionalism and civility is not grounds to set aside a judgment.

David Hunter

Cox v. Hefley, 2019 UT App 60 (Filed April 18, 2019). In this case, a Mother and Father signed an […]

Stipulations signed by a party but not by the attorney, may be enforced and binding.

utahmediations

Cox v. Hefley, 2019 UT App 60 (Filed April 18, 2019). In this case, a Mother had brought a petition […]

Court rejects argument that an order transferring judicial authority to a third-party neutral should be set aside.

David Hunter

Cox v. Hefley, 2019 UT App 60 (Filed April 18, 2019). In this case, a Mother and Father signed an […]

Fibernet Building, 1145 S 800 E, Orem, 84097

[email protected]