An attorney’s failure to comply with the standards of professionalism and civility is not grounds to set aside a judgment.

April 18, 2019

Cox v. Hefley, 2019 UT App 60 (Filed April 18, 2019).

In this case, a Mother and Father signed an agreement to modify the previous orders relating to the Mother’s parent time and certain conditions the Mother would have to be in compliance with to have unsupervised visitation. The Mother signed the agreement, but her attorney did not. Later the Mother attempted to set aside the stipulation on several grounds, including that her attorney failed to comply with the Utah Standards of Professionalism and Civility. The court found:

“¶22 Next, Hefley asserts that Cox’s attorney acted “inappropriately” and in violation of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct. This argument is equally unavailing. As this court has previously explained, “[w]hile compliance with the Utah Standards of Professionalism and Civility is encouraged of all attorneys, an attorney’s failure to comply is not grounds for setting aside a judgment.” Aghdasi v. Saberin, 2015 UT App 73, ¶ 9, 347 P.3d 427. We stop well short of determining that Cox’s attorney violated any professional rule. But even if we were to accept Hefley’s assertion that Cox’s attorney “violate[d] the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct,” that conclusion, by itself, would not require reversal in this case. See id.”

Cox v. Hefley, 2019 UT App 60 (Filed April 18, 2019).

To read entire case, click HERE.

April 16, 2020
Alimony and Imputing Income for Unemployment.

As part of these analyses [for alimony], “courts in divorce cases may consider imputing income to an unemployed spouse in […]

Read More
May 14, 2020
To Create a Common Law Marriage, the Couple May Consent by Agreement or by the Presence of Certain Circumstances: Assuming Marital Responsibilities.

Volk v. Vieccchi, 2020 UT App 77 (Filed May 14, 2020).  To establish a common law marriage, the parties must […]

Read More
June 17, 2021
Appeals court reverses order of joint custody of 43/57 percent to 50/50.

Mahanthi v. Nakkina, UT Ct. App. No. 20190750-CA (Filed June 17, 2021). Appeals Court reverses trial court order of 43% […]

Read More
envelopephone-handsetmap-markermagnifiercrossmenuarrow-up-circle