Alimony: Is Padding Expenses Justified? Or Risky?

December 28, 2018

A Court May Decline to Accept Claimed Expenses that Are Overstated and Unsupported. This is an appeal from a district court’s award of alimony in the aftermath of a contentious divorce. Wife contends that the court abused its discretion when it declined to accept her claimed expenses at face value--even when the claimed expenses by Wife had no relation to historical needs, exceeded the Husband's take-home pay, were overstated, and Wife failed to provide credible evidence regarding finances and expenses--as opposed to Husband's testimony which was credible, detailed and specific.

Hartvigsen v. Hartvigsen, 2018 UT App 238 (Filed December 28, 2018)

Click HERE to read entire case.

January 10, 2019
12 Statutory Basis for Contempt and Inherent Contempt Powers

Rosser v. Rosser Summary: A statutory contempt remedy simply does not fit the facts of this case, even if we […]

Read More
July 12, 2018
When a parent can show all the factors for the "optional" 40% parent time schedule, is a court required to order it? No, it still has discretion.

Lay v. Lay, 2018 UT Ct App 137 (July 12, 2018) Utah statutes have a “minimum” parent time (“visitation”) schedule […]

Read More
April 12, 2018
A Petition to Modify Custody Requires a "Substantial and Material Change of Circumstances" Whereas a Request to Modify Parent Time Only May Only Require a "Change of Circumstances"

In this case, at the time of trial, the parties lived about 60 minutes apart. The court found that the […]

Read More
envelopephone-handsetmap-markermagnifiercrossmenuarrow-up-circle