Common Law Marriage and the Uniform and General Reputation

May 14, 2020

Volk v. Vieccchi, 2020 UT App 77 (Filed May 14, 2020). 

To establish a common law marriage, you need to establish several factors including a uniform and general reputation of being a married couple. A uniform and general reputation is just that–uniform and general–not a perfect or total reputation. Not every person needs to know a couple is married, but rather a uniform and general reputation. This is different than the defense against the establishment of a common law marriage trying to show that the couple has a predominately partial or divided. If most people believe a couple is married and then generally and predominately hold themselves out as married, but there are a few individuals that “know” they are not married, the few do not undue the general reputation of the many. “¶20 But in crafting section 30-1-4.5, our legislature chose to base this requirement on the couple’s acquisition of a uniform and general reputation for being husband and wife, not on the awareness by a few of the legal status of a couple’s union… ¶21 The plain meaning of the term “reputation” indicates that it does not rise and fall on particular persons’ knowledge. Rather, a reputation is a collective perception or estimation by the public or a community.”

Click HERE to review the entire case.

Volk v. Vieccchi, 2020 UT App 77 (Filed May 14, 2020). 

January 22, 2021
Special Master orders are effective as orders when made and a court may find contempt for disobeying them.

Thomas v. Thomas, 2021 UT App 8 (Filed January 22, 2021) Jeremy and Jody Tasker Thomas were divorced in 2013. […]

Read More
May 14, 2020
To Create a Common Law Marriage, the Couple May Consent by Agreement or by the Presence of Certain Circumstances: Assuming Marital Responsibilities.

Volk v. Vieccchi, 2020 UT App 77 (Filed May 14, 2020).  To establish a common law marriage, the parties must […]

Read More
February 13, 2020
Credit card debts that represent an expense should not be double counted in the court’s needs analysis.

Redden v. Redden, 2020, UT App 22 (Filed February 13, 2020). Husband conceded that some of the expenses underlying the […]

Read More
envelopephone-handsetmap-markermagnifiercrossmenuarrow-up-circle