The standards to change parent time are distinct and different from the standard to change custody.

September 27, 2018

Several years after a divorce, a father filed a petition to modify requesting a change of custody. The court found that there was not a change of circumstances to reopen custody, but did modify parent time.

¶16 “The change in circumstances required to justify a modification of a divorce decree varies with the type of modification sought.” Haslam v. Haslam, 657 P.2d 757, 758 (Utah 1982). Therefore, “a specific change in circumstances may justify reconsideration of one provision of a divorce decree while not justifying reconsideration of another provision.” Becker v. Becker, 694 P.2d 608, 611 (Utah 1984). A material change of circumstances with respect to parent-time is thus “a different inquiry from whether there was a material change with respect to custody.” Jones v. Jones, 2016 UT App 94, ¶ 10, 374 P.3d 45. When modifying parent-time, the petitioner is required to make only “some showing of a change in circumstances,” which “does not rise to the same level as the substantial and material showing required when a district court alters custody.” Id. A court may therefore determine that a change in circumstances warrants modification of parent-time while simultaneously determining there is no substantial and material change in circumstances to justify a modification of custody. In other words, it is not necessarily erroneous for a court to determine that a particular change in circumstances is sufficient enough to warrant a change in a parent-time schedule, but not significant enough to warrant a modification of custody.

Erickson v. Erickson, 2018 App 184 (Filed September 27, 2018)

Read entire case HERE.

 

September 27, 2018
A child’s preference, even if age 14 or older, may be excluded as evidence if the court finds there was no change of circumstances sufficient to reopen the case.

¶35 Father contends the court erred by “refusing to consider testimony from [Child].” Before and during trial, and through various […]

Read More
December 28, 2018
Alimony: Is Padding Expenses Justified? Or Risky?

A Court May Decline to Accept Claimed Expenses that Are Overstated and Unsupported. This is an appeal from a district […]

Read More
March 16, 2018
For imputation of income at trial, you only need to prove that a relevant job exists, not a specific job

Bond v. Bond, March 16, 2018 Held:  Jobs Available can be General, Not Specific--need to prove only that jobs exist […]

Read More
envelopephone-handsetmap-markermagnifiercrossmenuarrow-up-circle